【2018两会·改革新征程】行动起来，掀起学习宪法的热潮！

Community portal Welcome

Reference desk Request an article

Village pump Archives

Administrators' noticeboard Report vandalism ? Votes for deletion

百度 1976年1月8日在北京逝世。

Votes for deletion is the process whereby the community discusses whether a page should be deleted or not, depending on the consensus of the discussion.

Please read and understand the Wikiquote deletion policy before editing this page.

• Explain your reasoning for every page you list here, even if you think it is obvious.
• Always be sure to sign your entry or vote, or it will not be counted.

The process

Requesting deletions

To list a single article for deletion for the first time, follow this three-step process:

I: Put the deletion tag on the article.

Insert the {{vfd-new}} tag at the top of the page.

• Please do not mark the edit as minor.
• Use the edit summary to indicate the nomination; this can be as simple as "VFD".
• You can check the "Watch this page" box to follow the page in your watchlist. This allows you to notice if the VfD tag is removed by a vandal.
• Save the page.

II: Create the article's deletion discussion page.

Click the link saying "this page's entry" to open the deletion-debate page.

• Copy the following: {{subst:vfd-new2|pg=PAGENAME|text=REASONING — ~~~~}}. Replace PAGENAME with the name of the page you're nominating, and REASONING with an explanation of why you think the page should be deleted. Note that the signature/timestamp characters (~~~~) are placed inside the braces {{ }}, not outside as with standard posts.
• Explanations are important when nominating a page for deletion. While it may be obvious to you why a page should be deleted, not everyone will understand and you should provide a clear but concise explanation. Please remember to sign your comment by putting ~~~~ at the end.
• Consider checking "Watch this page" to follow the progress of the debate.
• Save the page.

III: Notify users who monitor VfD discussion.

Copy the tag below, and then click  THIS LINK  to open the deletion log page. At the bottom of the log page, insert:

{{subst:vfd-new3|pg=PAGENAME}}

replacing PAGENAME appropriately.

• Please include the name of the nominated page in the edit summary.
• Save the page. Your insertion will be automatically expanded to the same form as the preceding lines in the file: {{Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME}}.
• Consider also adding {{subst:VFDNote|PAGENAME}} ~~~~ to the talk page of the article's principal contributor(s).

Note: Suggestions for requesting deletion of multiple pages, non-article pages, and repeat nominations may be found at VFD tips.

Voting on deletions

Once listed, the entire Wikiquote community is invited to vote on whether to keep or delete each page, or take some other action on it. Many candidate articles will have specific dates by which to vote; if none is given, you can assume at least seven days after the article is listed before the votes are tallied.

To vote, jump or scroll down to the entry you wish to vote on, click its "edit" link, and add your vote to the end of the list, like one of these:

• Keep. ~~~~
• Delete. ~~~~
• (other actions; explain) ~~~~
• Comment (not including action) ~~~~

Possible other actions include Merge, Rename, Redirect, Move to (sister project). Please be clear and concise when describing your action.

The four tildes (~~~~) will automatically add your user ID and a timestamp to your vote. This is necessary to ensure each Wikiquotian gets only a single vote. You can add some comments to your vote (before the tildes) to explain your reasons, but it is not required. However, it may help others to decide which way to vote.

Please do not add a vote after the closing date and time; any late vote may be struck out and ignored by the closing admin.

NOTE: Although we use the term "vote", VfD is not specifically a democratic process, as we have no way of verifying "one person, one vote". It is designed to "take the temperature" of the community on a subject. Sysops have the responsibility of judging the results based on a variety of factors, including (besides the votes) policies, practices, precedents, arguments, compromises between conflicting positions, and seriousness of the participants.

Closing votes and deleting articles

Sysops have the responsibility to review the list and determine what articles have achieved a consensus, whether it is for deletion, preservation, or some other action. All candidate articles should be listed here at least seven days before the votes are tallied. Many VfD entries will have "Vote closes" notices to indicate when the votes will be tallied.

• The sysop tallying the vote should add a Template:Vfd top ("vote closed" header with the result of the vote) to the top of the article's VfD discussion page, as well as a Template:Vfd bottom at the end of the page.
• If consensus is for deletion, the sysop should follow the deletion process to delete the article.
• If it is to keep, or if there is no consensus for action, the sysop should remove the {{vfd-new}} tag from the article and post a notice on the article's talk page about the completed VfD, including a link to the VfD discussion on that article. The {{vfd-kept-new}} template can be used for a standard notice.
• There may also be a vote to move (rename) or otherwise change the article. The sysop's actions will depend on the specific situation in these cases. In those cases, a notice should also be posted on the talk page documenting the decision.

To avoid conflict of interest, a sysop should never close a VfD that he or she started. However, a sysop may close a VfD in which he or she has voted.

After a reasonable time, a sysop will then move the entire entry into the appropriate month page of the VfD log. (Some old discussions are available only in the old Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive.)

Note: In the interest of cross-wiki cooperation, please check Wikipedia to make sure their articles don't link back to an article that has just been deleted. Also de-link any other language edition articles.

Reviewing closed votes

All closed votes will be archived indefinitely in per-month pages at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Log. (A few are still found only in the old Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive.) See that page for details.

Deletion candidates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Deleted--Jusjih (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2025 (UTC).

Michael Kulich

This page is just a quote from a racist website that is not directly, at least from the quote itself, related to the subject. Yes the subject was a pornographer, I am not sure if Jewish; I am not sure if the quote is actually from him, I highly doubt that. — Karel Bílek (talk) 11:59, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

It seems that the quote _actually_ is from him, but I am not watching anything on "Goyim TV" and I cannot find any other source Karel Bílek (talk) 12:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 12:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - On en.wp the article for the person was redirected, and the article on the company was deleted. Prior to the redirect, the article was mostly trivia and a lot of the sources were press releases, forgetable publicity stunts, and fairly routine sources from inside the industry. Looks a lot like smut-cruft. The redirect happened after he died, so the chances of something new emerging to support quotability or notability appear slim.
  He does appear to be Jewish. The quote is apparently from this site because it's basically anti-Semitic YouTube or something, and it's a quote from a Jew saying that Jews control everything. GMG^talk 12:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom and above comment. ~ UDScott (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom and above comment. This is the kind of thing that needs to be removed from Wikiquote. Markjoseph125 (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Nikesh Lagun

Appears to just be some dude who got a paper published in a fee based open access journal. He's also an aspiring musician, but doesn't seem to have hit the big time yet. Article was deleted last week on the English Wikipedia for lack of notability. GMG^talk 14:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 15:00, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete for lack of notability, per nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 15:16, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of notability, per nom. Probably self-promotion. Markjoseph125 (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Deleted. GMG^talk 18:53, 25 July 2025 (UTC).

Template:Pixar

Precedent for deleting film studio navboxes as not particularly helpful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:00, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete. GMG^talk 19:06, 25 July 2025 (UTC).

Template:Walt Disney Animation Studios

Precedent for deleting film studio navboxes as not particularly helpful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:00, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete. GMG^talk 19:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC).

Template:20th Century Animation

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:24, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete. GMG^talk 19:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC).

Template:Blue Sky Studios

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete. GMG^talk 19:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC).

Template:The Boss Baby

Two articles is not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:The Croods

Too few articles to be useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Hanna-Barbera

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:03, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Cartoon Network Studios

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:03, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Don Bluth Entertainment

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:DreamWorks Animation

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete as an unnecessary distraction from the quotes. To the closer: please apply my vote to all the other film/TV studio footers. Ficaia (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Illumination

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Sony Pictures Animation

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Klasky Csupo

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 05:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 06:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:DreamWorks Pictures

Per precedent that film/TV studio footers are not useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 06:06, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 07:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:V for Vendetta

Navigates too few things to be useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 06:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 07:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Blair Witch

Navigates too few things to be useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 06:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 07:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Template:Limitless

Navigates too few things to be useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 06:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 07:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete. GMG^talk 13:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC).

Template:Red (franchise)

Navigates too few things to be useful for navigation. — —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 06:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom; a whole bunch of these templates have already been deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 07:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

David Woodard

In a report I published on enwiki, I detailed how a network of accounts and IP proxies had been used to promote American musician David Woodard as far and wide across wikis as possible. This article was originally created by Judgtastic (talk · contributions), one of the accounts in the network, and then expanded by IP proxies in Seoul, Perth and London. I believe that this constitutes a vanity page, serving to boost the obscure and often nonsensical thoughts of an obscure author (including from an unpublished manuscript of his), and that it therefore qualifies for deletion under Wikiquote's deletion policy. — Grnrchst (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete, this is plain vanity and spamming. Bw Orland (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete, I share the view of Orland, this looks like self-promotion. Thanks to user Grnrchst for the effort in reporting this. --1904.CC (talk) 20:57, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; self-promotion. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

• See also. Woodard (or his "agent") have also spread his wisdom to a number of themes. This should be deleted as a part of the cleanup. Bw Orland (talk) 22:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

  I did the cleanup, and removed the nonsensical quotations from Metamorphosis, Friedrich Nietzsche, Love, Gentlemen, Secrecy, Marriage, Drugs, Timothy McVeigh, Communication, Nerd, Fire, Morality and Coffee. However, I would keep his quote on the Dreamachine, which seems to have some merit. 1904.CC (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 21:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Lego City Undercover

Not that the subject of this page is not notable, nor deserving of a page, but because in its current state, it has become so bloated with entirely too many quotes. Surely it represents a copyright violation or is close to it. Every day, more quotes are added and it's become out of hand - and nearly impossible to decide what should stay and what should go. I recommend deleting it and starting over, with a much smaller set of quotes. — UDScott (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 19:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete and start over. ~ UDScott (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
• Speedy delete This is an obvious copyright violation and also just not quotable. I don't know that anything in this video game is memorable for quotations (I have played it, but not finished it), but even if there is something, it's definitely not literally all dialogue and text in the game. I feel bad sometimes for users who post these labor-intensive and completely off-track entries, but this is probably just copying and pasting from another source like GameFAQs and really, it should never have gotten this far. If this is kept, then at the very least, revert back to a reasonable point in the history and revdel all the obvious copyright violation bits.—Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 18:09, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; quotability; copyright violoation. Do we really want this to be the longest page on Wikiquote? Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:10, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Kill la Kill pages

• Kill la Kill
• Kill la Kill The Game: IF

Lack of quotability on both pages-- the second page only has about two character-specific quotes. The first of these two pages was nominated for deletion previously and had been deleted before, while the second page hasn't been updated in a year. Judging from the edit history of the former, these pages were created by the notorious SoulEaterFan, a user who has a history of vandalizing various TV show pages and incorporating characters from various anime, Kill la Kill included. 03isrflo62410 (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 22:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete, nom. 03isrflo62410 (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:11, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Last words in Digimon

Nothing quotable; far too long. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:16, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete Agreed. This is silly, guys. —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 16:22, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 17:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Economy of Vietnam

Delete on grounds of quotability. These do not meet the Wikiquote criterion: "Is the quote particularly witty, pithy, wise, eloquent, or poignant?" Nothing wrong with the two facts presented; however, they should be placed into the Wikipedia page. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 02:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC) Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, while the quotes are dry, I disagree that they are not worthy of keeping. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

  As mentioned, the facts could (and in my humble opinion should) be placed into the Wikipedia article; then this page could be deleted. Markjoseph125 (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Religion in Vietnam

Again, these are facts, not quotes, and should be included in the Wikipedia article. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 02:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, based solely on the second quote. I agree that the first one is pretty much just a recitation of facts and should be removed. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Pound Puppies (1986 TV series)

Notability (TV show ran barely one season), quotability (this is just dialogue, not "particularly witty, pithy, wise, eloquent, or poignant"), fair use (120K?? I don’t think so...). — Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 02:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Mario Party 6

Unnecessary. Non quotable. Clutter. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:49, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 02:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:49, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:49, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom - I see nothing here worth keeping. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Videogamedunkey

Notability, quotability, puerility. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 02:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Not clear where the notability argument is coming from. There are WP articles in three languages. GMG^talk 14:49, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

  Maybe. That doesn't address the issue of quotability. Or, for that matter, of puerility. Markjoseph125 (talk) 19:01, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Castlevania: Lords of Shadow

Quotability (not "particularly witty, pithy, wise, eloquent, or poignant"); juvenile — Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:03, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 03:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:03, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:04, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep - in general I agree with on this one, but the second listed quote seems worth keeping. I would remove the rest (and try to find other worthy quotes to replace them). ~ UDScott (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2

As part 1, so part 2. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 03:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, seems worthy to me. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Barbara Makhalisa

Quotability; pablum — Markjoseph125 (talk) 13:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 14:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 13:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 13:14, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Sibongile Mlambo

Notability; quotability — Markjoseph125 (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 14:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 13:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

The Hasty Hare

Quotability. Unnecessary. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 00:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, not sure what the objection is really, but I feel that these cartoons deserve a place here. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

  Suggesting deletion on grounds of quotability. Only two "quotes", neither of which is memorable, or likely to be be used by anyone in any context, so far as I can tell. Markjoseph125 (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

William Draper Byrne

Notability (no need for a page for every minor priest). Quotability (one generic bit of pablum). — Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 00:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. I have added more quotes and am prepared to work on the page further if necessary. --Gilldragon (talk) 14:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, especially with the new additions, I feel there is more to this page now. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Monarch: Legacy of Monsters

Notability (I really hope we aren't going to be deluged with ever streaming TV show). Quotability (only 2 quotes; one is an old chestnut; the other is pretty flat). — Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 01:00, 3 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, I disagree that this show is not notable - and streaming shows are just as ubiquitous (if not more so) than network or cable shows these days. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

  Keep, I agree with UDScott, and besides the show is still part of the Monsterverse and still showcases Warner Bros' Godzilla and Kong and each of their histories and flashbacks that take place before Kong: Skull Island, during and after Godzilla (2014) with Ford's journey, and how much Cate and her friends are going through in the show before Godzilla: King of the Monsters with Madison's journey. Bszabo15 (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

  Maybe, but this doesn't address the quotability issue. This is Wikiquote, after all... Markjoseph125 (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

  And it is made to put in quotes from realistic people, books, films, proverbs, and so on. Plus movies (theatrical, direct-to-video and streaming) and TV shows (cable, network and streaming (such as Monarch: Legacy of Monsters for Apple TV+)) should be treated as equals in terms of the genres of the entertainment industry, and everyone can add as many quotes in any media as they want. Bszabo15 (talk) 23:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

  However, there is the criterion of quotability. From the page Wikiquote:Quotability: "Is the quote particularly witty, pithy, wise, eloquent, or poignant?" Much (I would say "most") of what appears on pages for TV shows and (especially) video games fails this criterion. The entire page Wikiquote:Quotability makes for good reading; adhering to it would greatly improve the quality of Wikiquote. Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Alison Brooks

None of the quotes in the first section are sourced. Of the other two, the first is advertising; the second is hype. Unless this article can be radically cleaned up, it needs to be deleted. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 01:00, 3 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. This person seems notable, but the quotes are either not sourced or are not memorable. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Deleted by author request. GMG^talk 13:17, 28 July 2025 (UTC).

Keith Kahn-Harris

Notability. Two quotes, supposedly sourced, but the source appears to have nothing to do with the subject. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 01:00, 3 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 00:23, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete as creator. I was just starting out here when I created this. Thanks. Lofi Gurl (talk) 00:29, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as author request, per above. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:41, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Monsters, Inc. Scream Team

Delete on grounds of quotability. Completely anodyne ("That is not good." "Something’s not right." "All right!" Really??); nothing quotable on the page. — Markjoseph125 (talk) 21:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Vote closes: 22:00, 13 August 2025 (UTC). Markjoseph125 (talk) 21:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Delete as nominator. Markjoseph125 (talk) 21:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Delete Agreed. —Justin (koavf)?T?C?M? 22:13, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Delete per nom. 03isrflo62410 (talk) 22:44, 6 August 2025 (UTC)